Climate disclosures are frequently reviewed from fragmented submissions rather than fixed records.
The Evidentiary Rail for Verifiable Records

Issue disclosures and declarations as sealed, timestamped records.

Fixed evidence eliminates version disputes & drift.
VerifiedClimate Records issue automatically.
No human handling. No integration; only an email.

Generate First Record — €1
(Subsequent records €100)

View Sample Live Record

Carbon Removal Project — Monitoring & Verification Milestone

Funding Award Acceptance — Formal Acceptance Statement

Compliance Filing — Regulatory Disclosure Declaration

Post-Deployment Audit — Operational Verification Record

ESG Evidence Item — CSRD-Relevant Governance Assertion

Governance Disclosure — Board Oversight Statement

Grant Application Milestone — Submission Declaration

TRL-5 Prototype Demonstration — Progress Verification

TRL-4 Laboratory Validation — Milestone Declaration

Audit-supporting artefact — Management-assertion memo (Dublin · 2025-12-08T17:06 UTC)

Grant milestone submitted — Renewable-heating programme (Cork · 2025-05-27T14:37 UTC)

Prototype test logged — Circular-materials project (Galway · 2025-05-24T11:02 UTC)

TRL-3 lab validation — Carbon-removal pilot (Dublin · 2025-05-20T09:14 UTC)

Carbon Removal Project — Monitoring & Verification Milestone

Funding Award Acceptance — Formal Acceptance Statement

Compliance Filing — Regulatory Disclosure Declaration

Post-Deployment Audit — Operational Verification Record

ESG Evidence Item — CSRD-Relevant Governance Assertion

Governance Disclosure — Board Oversight Statement

Grant Application Milestone — Submission Declaration

TRL-5 Prototype Demonstration — Progress Verification

TRL-4 Laboratory Validation — Milestone Declaration

Audit-supporting artefact — Management-assertion memo (Dublin · 2025-12-08T17:06 UTC)

Grant milestone submitted — Renewable-heating programme (Cork · 2025-05-27T14:37 UTC)

Prototype test logged — Circular-materials project (Galway · 2025-05-24T11:02 UTC)

TRL-3 lab validation — Carbon-removal pilot (Dublin · 2025-05-20T09:14 UTC)

Scope and Guarantees

A VerifiedClimate Record is an evidentiary artefact issued at the point of declaration and preserved under neutral custody.

VerifiedClimate™ guarantees the timing, custody, and integrity of each VerifiedClimate Record at issuance. 

It preserves declarations exactly as submitted, without assessing or interpreting their content.

All assessment, assurance, and acceptance decisions remainwith independent reviewers and institutions. 

The sealed Reviewer Copy of a VerifiedClimate Record is the durable evidentiary artefact for institutional retention; the Live Record URL facilitates controlled access and sharing.

Responsibility Boundary
Verification of identity, authority, accuracy, completeness, and interpretation remains the responsibility of the submitting organisation and its reviewers.
This separation is intentional: VerifiedClimate™ provides evidentiary infrastructure; institutions retain judgment and control.

Regulatory Alignment

VerifiedClimate Records support evidentiary requirements commonly applied in audit and regulatory review, including timing integrity and custody traceability.

VerifiedClimate™ does not provide regulatory attestation or assurance. Institutions must align usage with their external auditors and applicable regulatory frameworks.

VerifiedClimate™ does not enforce compliance. Institutions define acceptance criteria, and all assessment, interpretation, and assurance remain with independent reviewers.

Operational Impact — Reduced Audit Friction and Dispute Risk

Climate disclosures often require reconstruction and retrospective verification across fragmented submissions.

VerifiedClimate™ now enables institutions to require that disclosures and declarations be issued as VerifiedClimate Records, fixing evidence as declared at the point of creation rather than reconstructing it after the fact.

Institutions typically do so by specifying VerifiedClimate™ Records as the required submission format within existing mechanisms such as engagement letters, RFPs, grant conditions, compliance checklists, or award processes — without changing internal systems.

Under this model, institutions gain:
• Reduced reconstruction and clarification cycles during review
• Elimination of version drift and timing ambiguity
• A single, durable evidentiary reference per declaration
• Faster audit, funding, and compliance readiness
• A complete, chronological lineage of VerifiedClimate Records when declarations require to be corrected or supplemented over time.

VerifiedClimate Records are immutable snapshots at issuance. Corrections or supplements are captured by issuing additional VerifiedClimate Records, preserving a complete chronological evidentiary trail.

Underlying Evidentiary Infrastructure

VerifiedClimate™ owns and operates RegistryRail, a sector-agnostic evidentiary infrastructure designed to issue timestamped, tamper-evident records wherever neutral custody is required.

RegistryRail™ is currently deployed exclusively through VerifiedClimate™, applying this architecture to climate- and sustainability-linked declarations without asserting or implying deployment in other domains.

Architectural Position
VerifiedClimate™ is built as procedural infrastructure that institutions can reference independently within their own processes, without reliance on VerifiedClimate™ for judgment, approval, or ongoing involvement.

Under this model, VerifiedClimate Records are issued using RegistryRail™, combining issuance-time custody metadata, tamper-evident packaging, and controlled sharing into a single institutional evidentiary format.

How Institutions Use VerifiedClimate™

      Audit Firms.
Clients provide a VerifiedClimate Record URL for each declaration
• Reviewers assess timing, attachments, and completeness directly from the VerifiedClimate Record
Auditors download the sealed Reviewer Copy for working papers and version control
Custody metadata and standardised formatting reduce reconstruction and accelerate evidence checks

      Multilateral & Public Funders.
Applicants issue VerifiedClimate Records for TRLs, milestones, governance declarations, and deliverables
Reviewers assess timing, attachments, and completeness directly from the Record
Records support transparent, defensible award decisions without manual reconstruction

      ESG & Corporate Compliance.

Disclosure teams fix high-material statements at issuance for CSRD- and SEC-aligned reporting
Tamper-evident declarations are attached to sustainability reports and regulatory filings
Reviewer Copies provide durable evidence of what was reported and when

HOW IT WORKS

1. Institutional Prescription

Institutions or reviewers specify which disclosures or milestones must be issued as VerifiedClimate  Records.

Submitters create a VerifiedClimate Record and retain exclusive control of visibility and sharing.
Only a valid email address is required.

2. Independent Issuance

Each submission is processed automatically, with no human handling, and based solely on submitted materials; VerifiedClimate does not review, verify, or approve submissions.

VerifiedClimate Records are timestamped, secured under ISO-27001-certified infrastructure, and delivered via a private URL with a downloadable Reviewer Copy.

3. Evidentiary Integrity

Records arrive in a standardised, review-ready structure. Custody metadata and consistent formatting support efficient evidence checks and reduce dispute risk.

VerifiedClimate™ verifies the issuance timestamp and integrity protections applied to each Record; it does not verify the underlying claims or disclosures.

Built for Audit & Regulatory Readiness

VerifiedClimate™ delivers Records structured for institutional scrutiny from the moment of issuance.

• RFC-3161 timestamping establishes a neutral, fixed point in time.

• SHA-256 hashing makes all content and attachments tamper-evident.

• Sealed Reviewer Copies provide a stable, review-ready PDF for workpapers.

• Non-editable Records ensure nothing can be altered after issuance.

• Consistent, standardised formatting supports efficient evidence review.

Auditors receive a complete, fixed, review-ready artefact — removing reconstruction and version uncertainty.

Grant Applications. Series A Readiness. TRL Level Validation.

Timestamped reports, milestone deliverables — forming verifiable audit trails, supporting grant decisions, early‑stage funding, and validating technical readiness for IP protection and due diligence.

ESG Reporting & Sustainability Proof Points.

Immutable records underpinning ESG updates, supplier disclosures, and sustainability reporting — strengthening trust with procurement teams, investors, and corporate stakeholders.

Public Records & Municipal Transparency.

Publicly referenceable climate project records — supporting council reporting, enabling community consultations, and strengthening civic accountability with transparent, time‑locked evidence.

Built for Audit & Regulatory Readiness

VerifiedClimate™ delivers Records structured for institutional scrutiny from the moment of issuance.

• RFC-3161 timestamping establishes a neutral, fixed point in time.

• SHA-256 hashing makes all content and attachments tamper-evident.

• Sealed Reviewer Copies provide a stable, review-ready PDF for workpapers.

• Non-editable Records ensure nothing can be altered after issuance.

• Consistent, standardised formatting supports efficient evidence review.

Auditors receive a complete, fixed, review-ready artefact — removing reconstruction and version uncertainty.

Built for Audit & Regulatory Readiness — No Reconstruction Required

• RFC-3161 timestamping establishes a neutral, fixed point in time
• SHA-256 hashing makes all content and attachments tamper-evident
• Sealed Reviewer Copies provide stable, review-ready PDFs for institutional workpapers
• Consistent, standardised formatting supports efficient evidence review

Auditors and reviewers receive a complete, fixed evidentiary artefact — removing reconstruction and version uncertainty.

Generate First Record — €1
(Subsequent records €100)
No Integration Required — Works with Existing Institutional Systems

Records are issued and held under neutral custody, independent of submitter and reviewer systems.

• No API integration, account creation, or technical setup
• No logins or passwords
• Only a valid email address required
• Reviewer-ready PDFs suitable for long-term archiving

VerifiedClimate™ has no routine access to Record contents and operates no human-handling review process.

Durability & Neutral Custody

VerifiedClimate™ preserves evidence without accessing or interpreting it.

• Records are held on encrypted, redundant storage provided by independently certified suppliers
• Submitters control visibility and sharing of Live Record URLs
• VerifiedClimate™ cannot access, modify, or retrieve submitted materials
• Reviewer Copies provide offline artefacts for retention in institutional files
• Automated workflows minimise confidentiality and operational risk

Records themselves are permanent.
Live Record URLs facilitate review and sharing and may be subject to lifecycle management without affecting evidentiary integrity.

Continuity & Independence
VerifiedClimate Records are designed to remain usable independent of VerifiedClimate™. Sealed Reviewer Copies retained in institutional archives remain complete and permanent. All timestamps and integrity mechanisms rely on open standards, not proprietary formats.

Simple, Transparent Pricing

Per-Record pricing.
No subscriptions. No lock-in.

Evaluation Phase
During institutional evaluation and early adoption:
• €1 per Record
• Records carry identical evidentiary properties to production Records
• Applies uniformly during this phase Production Pricing

Upon production deployment:
€100 per Record
Flat, uniform pricing
No tiering, volume discounts, or submitter-based variation

What Each Record Includes
Each VerifiedClimate Record includes:
• Issuance and sealing at declaration
• A sealed Reviewer Copy for permanent retention
• A 12-month Live Record URL for controlled access and sharing

Live Record availability beyond 12 months may be supported where required, subject to operational policy.

Access
• Records are issued fully automatically:
• No technical integrationNo contractual commitment
• Only a valid email address required (institutional domains recommended)


ANTICIPATED REVIEWER REQUIREMENTS
1. Guide to demonstrating Technology Readiness Level Declarations (TRL 1–7)

Early-Stage TRL 1–3

  • Concept notes and research outlines – initial scope, baseline hypotheses, and problem definition.
  • Preliminary feasibility studies – early analyses supporting technical potential.
  • Supporting literature reviews – peer-reviewed research, white papers, or patents cited as a foundation.
  • Initial experimental data – indicative lab findings, basic proof-of-principle results.
  • Optional R&D funding approvals – small-scale grants, institutional seed funding evidence.

Mid-Stage TRL Validation (TRL 4–5)

Prototype development and validation stages expected by regulators, institutional reviewers, or funding authorities include:

  • Proof-of-concept validation – controlled lab test reports confirming feasibility.
  • Prototype engineering documentation – schematics, Bills of Materials, build records.
  • Simulation and experimental data – computational models, validation reports, raw outputs.
  • Risk and compliance assessments – hazard analyses, conformity with safety standards.
  • Independent expert assessment – validation reports or assessor opinions.
  • Optional funding evidence – milestone reports for mid-stage grants.

Pilot-Scale Demonstrations (TRL 6–7)

Field testing, Series A funding readiness, and regulatory alignment at pilot scale typically include:

  • Field trial documentation – monitored conditions, test performance reports.
  • Extended compliance assessments – certifications, CE marking, hazard reports.
  • Third-party evaluations – independent test or validation reports.
  • Commercial feasibility studies – market readiness analysis, adoption forecasts.
  • Partnership confirmations – letters of support from regulators or industrial partners.
  • Gap analysis for TRL 8–9 – remaining steps to market deployment.

(TRL 8–9 market readiness is referenced in #4 below, "Guide to Governance Disclosures & Stakeholder Assurance Filings.")

2. Guide to Grant Applications & Public Funding Packages

Funding authorities such as Horizon Europe, Innovate UK, and U.S. DOE programmes typically expect:

  • Official funding call reference – published programme identifier.
  • Completed application form in required format – strictly as specified by the funding body. (Formal submission must still follow the funding authority’s channels; many organizations maintain a VerifiedClimate™ record in parallel for timestamped archival.)
  • Detailed technical and impact narrative – project objectives, outcomes, alignment with programme goals.
  • Structured work plan – milestones, deliverables, resource allocation.
  • Budget and cost justification – eligible and co-funded costs aligned with EU or national rules.
  • Organizational capacity records – staff CVs, prior experience, institutional endorsements.
  • Partnership confirmations – letters of intent, consortium agreements.
  • Risk management plans – registers, mitigation measures, ethical considerations.
  • Regulatory and ethical approvals – environmental permits, ethics board clearance.
  • Optional SME or certification proof – SME status declarations, ISO accreditations.

3. Guide to CSRD- and IFRS S2-Aligned ESG Disclosures

Disclosures aligned with CSRD, IFRS S2, or Paris Agreement frameworks typically include:

  • Consolidated ESG or sustainability report – structured to CSRD or IFRS S2 guidance.
  • Underlying emissions inventories – Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions (ISO 14064-compliant).
  • Supply chain due diligence – supplier codes of conduct, ESG audits, compliance declarations.
  • Board-approved sustainability policies – climate transition plans, Paris Agreement alignment.
  • Third-party assurance reports – limited or reasonable assurance from accredited auditors.
  • Methodology statements – KPI calculation methods, materiality matrices.
  • Climate risk and opportunity assessments – TCFD-aligned scenario planning.
  • Year-on-year comparative ESG data – historical performance datasets.
  • EU Taxonomy disclosures – alignment of turnover, CapEx, and OpEx.
  • Optional investor briefing materials – ESG decks, stakeholder updates.

4. Guide to Governance Disclosures & Stakeholder Assurance Filings

Board submissions, investor disclosures, and stakeholder filings typically include:

  • Formal board or committee papers – resolutions, decision briefs, agenda packs.
  • Risk registers and analysis – financial, operational, or environmental risks.
  • Stakeholder assurance briefings – investor, shareholder, or consortium documents.
  • Minutes or records of prior meetings – governance context.
  • Annexed technical or financial schedules – supplementary decision-making evidence.
  • Material event disclosures – updates on major governance matters.
  • Updated governance policies – codes of conduct, conflict-of-interest registers.
  • External assurance reports – governance audits by PwC, Deloitte, or similar.
  • Legal or regulatory opinions – external counsel reviews.
  • Optional oversight letters – confirmations from funders or regulators.
5. Guide to asserting Carbon, Climate & Environmental Claims

Offset project developers and organizations disclosing emissions reductions under the Paris Agreement, ISO 14064, or voluntary carbon standards typically include:

6. Guide to providing Procurement & Tender Evidence

Public tenders and institutional procurement processes typically require:

  • Official tender documentation – published tender notice, scope of work.
  • Mandatory compliance certificates – ISO accreditations, tax clearances, insurances.
  • Technical proposals – design specifications, implementation methodologies.
  • Financial proposals – itemized pricing schedules, bid validity letters.
  • Proof of organizational capacity – prior experience records, technical staff CVs.
  • Supply chain due diligence – declarations of origin, ESG compliance documentation.
  • Client references – endorsements from previous contracting authorities.
  • Risk mitigation strategies – health & safety, environmental risk protocols.
  • Signed declarations – anti-corruption, conflict-of-interest disclosures.
  • Optional consortium agreements – partner or subcontractor confirmations.

7. Guide to Research & Academic Declarations

Research outputs submitted for academic publication, funding reviews, or institutional archiving typically include:

  • Draft or published manuscript – preprints or journal-ready articles.
  • Underlying datasets – raw and processed research data.
  • Statistical or computational methodologies – analysis workflows, code repositories.
  • Ethical approval documentation – IRB approvals, research clearance.
  • Literature review archives – key references, prior evidence.
  • Peer review correspondence – reviewer feedback, responses.
  • Conflict of interest disclosures – required statements for journal or funder compliance.
  • Grant funding acknowledgments – evidence of financial support.
  • Licensing and open-access agreements – publication rights confirmations.
  • Optional supplementary materials – high-resolution figures, multimedia.

8. Guide to Certification & Accreditation Submissions

Certification bodies (ISO, FSC, LEED) and accreditation authorities typically expect:

  • Certification application forms – strictly in the authority’s required format.
  • Quality manuals and policies – documented management systems.
  • Standard operating procedures (SOPs) – process-level documentation.
  • Evidence of implementation – operational logs, training registers.
  • Internal audit reports – pre-certification self-assessments.
  • Corrective action plans – responses to identified gaps.
  • Legal or regulatory permits – licenses required for accreditation.
  • Third-party evaluation reports – external auditor findings.
  • Historical certifications – records of prior accreditations.
  • Optional global alignment references – UN SDGs, Paris Agreement targets.

9. Guide to Partnership, Consortium & Joint Venture Records

Formal collaboration agreements and governance records generally include:

  • Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) – outlining high-level intent.
  • Consortium agreements – legal collaboration terms.
  • Governance frameworks – decision-making structures, escalation mechanisms.
  • Financial commitments – cost-sharing arrangements.
  • Risk allocation statements – liability, indemnity, insurance clauses.
  • IP agreements – ownership and licensing of background/foreground IP.
  • Work package definitions – partner-specific deliverables.
  • Third-party endorsements – letters of support from regulators or investors.
  • Contingency and withdrawal protocols – conflict resolution clauses.
  • Optional communications agreements – joint branding policies.

10. Guide to General Compliance & Regulatory Filings

Broader compliance filings, statutory disclosures, and regulatory submissions typically require:

  • Regulatory forms and templates – prescribed by oversight bodies.
  • Audited financial statements – statutory accounts, tax filings.
  • Operational compliance reports – health & safety, environmental, or quality.
  • Data privacy documentation – GDPR/CCPA registers, DPIAs.
  • Stakeholder consultation records – public engagement summaries.
  • Independent legal opinions – external counsel reviews.
  • Official correspondence – communications with regulators.
  • Permit renewals and licenses – documentation of authorizations.
  • Assurance or attestation reports – third-party compliance verification.
  • Optional voluntary disclosures – adherence to industry pledges.

Common Submissions

Average Upload Volume

Average Submission Time (minutes)

Early-stage TRL Validation (TRL 1-3). Concept notes. Evidence Proving Tech Feasability for Grant/Funding Submissions (R&D, innovation funding, and public tenders)

(12) PDF,
(4) Word (.doc/.docx),
(2) Excel (.xls/.xlsx),
(1) Image (.jpg/.png), End.

Average (18) min, End.

Mid-Stage TRL Validation (TRL 4–5)
(prototype test plans for institutional or investor reviews)

(11) PDF,
(3) Word (.doc/.docx),
(1) Excel (.xls/.xlsx),
(1) Image (.jpg/.png), End.

Average (16) min, End.

Pilot-Scale Demonstrations (TRL 6–7)
(field trial documentation for Series A funding readiness, partners and regulators)

(16) PDF,
(5) Word (.doc/.docx),
(2) Excel (.xls/.xlsx),
(2) Image (.jpg/.png), End.

Average (22) min, End.

Carbon Claim Submissions (offset developers proving reductions to buyers, auditors, registries)

(19) PDF,
(3) Word (.doc/.docx),
(2) Excel (.xls/.xlsx),
(3) Image (.jpg/.png), End.

Average (26) min, End.

ESG Reporting Packages (KPI tables, emissions data, supply chain metrics for compliance disclosures needing timestamped backing)

(24) PDF,
(5) Word (.doc/.docx),
(3) Excel (.xls/.xlsx),
(1) Image (.jpg/.png), End.

Average (28) min, End.

Governance Disclosure / Stakeholder Assurance Filing (for Boards, Funds, or Consortia—board packs, risk reports, investor / shareholder briefings)

(10) PDF,
(3) Word (.doc/.docx),
(1) Excel (.xls/.xlsx), End.

Average (20) min, End.

Disclosure & Timestamping of Innovation (defending prior art, design records, patent, and IP)

(4) PDF,
(5) Word (.doc/.docx),
(1) Excel (.xls/.xlsx),
(1) Image (.jpg/.png), End.

Average (11) min, End.


Carbon Removal Project — Monitoring & Verification Milestone

Funding Award Acceptance — Formal Acceptance Statement

Compliance Filing — Regulatory Disclosure Declaration

Post-Deployment Audit — Operational Verification Record

ESG Evidence Item — CSRD-Relevant Governance Assertion

Governance Disclosure — Board Oversight Statement

Grant Application Milestone — Submission Declaration

TRL-5 Prototype Demonstration — Progress Verification

TRL-4 Laboratory Validation — Milestone Declaration

Audit-supporting artefact — Management-assertion memo (Dublin · 2025-12-08T17:06 UTC)

Grant milestone submitted — Renewable-heating programme (Cork · 2025-05-27T14:37 UTC)

Prototype test logged — Circular-materials project (Galway · 2025-05-24T11:02 UTC)

TRL-3 lab validation — Carbon-removal pilot (Dublin · 2025-05-20T09:14 UTC)

Carbon Removal Project — Monitoring & Verification Milestone

Funding Award Acceptance — Formal Acceptance Statement

Compliance Filing — Regulatory Disclosure Declaration

Post-Deployment Audit — Operational Verification Record

ESG Evidence Item — CSRD-Relevant Governance Assertion

Governance Disclosure — Board Oversight Statement

Grant Application Milestone — Submission Declaration

TRL-5 Prototype Demonstration — Progress Verification

TRL-4 Laboratory Validation — Milestone Declaration

Audit-supporting artefact — Management-assertion memo (Dublin · 2025-12-08T17:06 UTC)

Grant milestone submitted — Renewable-heating programme (Cork · 2025-05-27T14:37 UTC)

Prototype test logged — Circular-materials project (Galway · 2025-05-24T11:02 UTC)

TRL-3 lab validation — Carbon-removal pilot (Dublin · 2025-05-20T09:14 UTC)


Registry-Style Submissions
without the Overhead

A declaration referencing a water efficiency retrofit program across multiple retail locations. Supporting data included device logs and regional comparison benchmarks.

Submitted under: Brands, Retailers, Logistics & Large Enterprises — specifically by a regional sustainability lead.

A public-facing record detailing startup-led R&D into biogenic carbon capture. Submission included time-stamped milestones and technical evidence package.

Submitted under: Startups, ClimateTechs & Emerging Ventures — specifically by a technology development team.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I help your organization?
Where do my donations go?
How can I become a volunteer?
How can I learn more about your organization?
What kinds of projects do you undertake?